Can Lorentz Transformations Be Derived from General Relativity?

How local inertial frames connect Lorentz transformations in special relativity to curved spacetime.

Lorentz transformations appear in general relativity because each tangent space carries a Lorentzian metric. Spacetime need not be flat for this local statement to hold.

This note revises my original Chinese answer.

At an event pp, choose an orthonormal frame for the metric, so its components are

η=diag(1,1,1,1).\eta=\operatorname{diag}(-1,1,1,1).

If another frame at the same event is orthonormal, its change-of-frame matrix Λ\Lambda satisfies

ΛTηΛ=η.\Lambda^{\mathsf T}\eta\Lambda=\eta.

That is the defining condition for a Lorentz transformation. The relation concerns frames in the tangent space at an event; arbitrary coordinate transformations on a curved region need not be Lorentz transformations.

What a local inertial coordinate system removes

For a sufficiently smooth Lorentzian metric, normal coordinates centered at pp can be chosen so that

gμν(p)=ημν,ρgμν(p)=0.g_{\mu\nu}(p)=\eta_{\mu\nu},\qquad \partial_\rho g_{\mu\nu}(p)=0.

The Christoffel symbols then vanish at pp. Curvature generally remains in second-order terms, so the metric is not necessarily equal to η\eta throughout a neighborhood. Tong's discussion of normal coordinates develops this distinction.

In flat spacetime, inertial Cartesian coordinate systems can instead describe a whole suitable region with constant Minkowski metric. Their transformations are affine:

x=Λx+a.x'=\Lambda x+a.

They are Poincaré transformations, becoming linear Lorentz transformations when the origins coincide. Even vanishing curvature everywhere does not by itself guarantee that a spacetime has the global topology of Minkowski space.

Thus general relativity contains local Lorentz geometry from the outset. Flatness is required for extending the Minkowski description across a region, not for relating orthonormal frames at a point.